Tandridge District Council, together with other district and borough councils in England, is earmarked for abolition under government plans for a major shake-up of local government.
Local services in Surrey are currently governed under a two-tier system with 11 district and borough councils responsible for services such as planning, waste collection, collecting council tax and, in Tandridge’s case, managing around 2,580 council homes. Then there is Surrey County Council (SCC) which is responsible for other services such as highways, education and adult social care.
All these councils will be abolished but it’s not clear what will replace them. There could be a single Surrey unitary authority or two or three separate unitaries. A unitary council provides all local services for a single area.
The government is dealing only with SCC and I am concerned about the lack of clarity over what will come next and the lack of consultation so far between the county and the districts and boroughs and, most importantly, with residents and businesses. This is despite a very fast timetable for the reorganisation.
On 9 January, SCC sent a letter to the government requesting that the May County Council elections are cancelled. The letter says: “New unitary elections could then take place in 2026 and a Mayoral election in 2027.”
Rushing the job, especially without talking to those most involved and affected, risks ending up with decisions that don’t deliver what’s best for Surrey or for Tandridge.
Local democracy
The government says its proposals will mean better value for money, better financial resilience, will give regions a bigger voice, will unlock economic growth and will help build 1.5m homes across England.
But there is concern that the change will create mega councils and all powerful mayors which could prove the opposite of devolution, that powers will be taken away from local communities with distant decision-takers enabling inappropriate measures to be agreed, for example regarding planning decisions.
Last December’s English Devolution White Paper stated that: “new unitary councils must be the right size to achieve efficiencies, improve capacity and withstand financial shocks. For most areas this will mean creating councils with a population of 500,000 or more, but there may be exceptions to ensure new structures make sense for an area."
Surrey has a population of around 1.2m. I believe a single Surrey unitary would be unworkable as well as harmful to local democracy. Two or three unitaries, for example an East and a West Surrey unitary, would be a better and more balanced way forward.
Debt
I am really concerned about the situation with debt. Last year, Woking Borough Council (one of Surrey’s 11 districts and boroughs) declared itself effectively bankrupt revealing a huge amount of debt from property investments. I believe its debt now stands at £1 billion. The government has so far indicated it will not take on the debt and that it should be shared across the new unitary council or councils.
It would be very unfair for Tandridge residents to inherit any of it, especially given the tremendous efforts our council has made to successfully achieve a financially stable position.
There are other districts and boroughs in west Surrey with very large borrowings linked to commercial investments. These are ok so long as they have a budget to make the repayments, but that’s a big if, and if the commercial income falters the repayments can no longer be made and the council can no longer balance its books. Surrey County Council also has a large amount of borrowing.
Next steps
The government has stated that an interim proposal for reorganisation would need to come forward by the end of March, with a full proposal by the end of May. It’s a tight timetable especially given that no details have yet been worked out.
For example, there are questions about the extent to which parish councils could take over some local services. With 22 parish councils in Tandridge District, their current capacity to do so will inevitably vary, as may their appetite for it. They would need support to implement any significant changes and should be engaged in the consultation process.
In any event, the district and boroughs and the county council will now need to work together on a proposal.
I will be fighting hard to stop a single unitary and for Tandridge not to be burdened with someone else’s debt.
It would be good to hear your views on the way forward so please do get in touch at Cllr.Catherine.Sayer@tandridge.gov.uk
Councillor Catherine Sayer
Leader of the Council